All posts by Sarah Cole

The Future of Summary Judgment, Arbitration and the Jury Trial Right

I just read an interesting keynote speech by Suja Thomas, a law professor at the University of Illinois. In the speech (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1960032), Professor Thomas discusses access to courts and juries before and after the summary judgment trilogy. Professor Thomas also discusses the impact of the Supreme Court’s recent arbitration jurisprudence, specifcally, the Concepcion decision. She … Continue reading The Future of Summary Judgment, Arbitration and the Jury Trial Right

Supreme Court Rules that State and Federal Courts Must Enforce Arbitration Agreements Even When Nonarbitrable Claims are Present in Complaint

On November 7, the Supreme Court ruled, in a per curiam opinion entitled KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1521.pdf, that a state court must order arbitrable disputes to arbitration even if the plaintiff’s complaint contains both arbitrable and inarbitrable claims. Affirming the strong federal policy in favor of arbitration, the Court stated that, “state and federal … Continue reading Supreme Court Rules that State and Federal Courts Must Enforce Arbitration Agreements Even When Nonarbitrable Claims are Present in Complaint

What constitutes “substantially related” issues where mediator wishes to represent a party in a subsequent dispute?

I just came across a case involving an ethics issue in mediation that I found interesting. Although the issue does not arise frequently, courts have considered whether a mediator can serve as a representative for one of the mediation parties in a subsequent dispute. The resolution often turns on the question whether the disputes are … Continue reading What constitutes “substantially related” issues where mediator wishes to represent a party in a subsequent dispute?

Information about AAA updating class arbitration rules and fallout from Concepcion

Yesterday, I participated in a panel reviewing AT&T v. Concepcion and its implications for the future. The panel included a defense lawyer and a lawyer from Public Justice. Efforts to limit Concepcion through litigation have not fared well to this point, but the better arguments seem to be that Concepcion could be limited to its … Continue reading Information about AAA updating class arbitration rules and fallout from Concepcion

Guest Blogger Kristen Blankley on “Taking Charge” and Facilitation

This post comes from my friend, Professor Kristen Blankley, of University of Nebraska College of Law. Kristen writes: “On Saturday, June 18, 2011, one of my students and I volunteered to act as facilitators in Lincoln’s Nebraska’s Taking Charge 2011 roundtable discussions between Lincoln citizens and officials from the Mayor’s Office. The Taking Charge program … Continue reading Guest Blogger Kristen Blankley on “Taking Charge” and Facilitation

Mershon Center for International Security at Ohio State University Seeks Candidates for Endowed Chair in Conflict Resolution

At Ohio State University, we are excited to announce a search for an endowed chair in peace studies and conflict resolution at our world-renown Mershon Center: The Mershon Center for International Security Studies at the Ohio State University is seeking candidates to fill an endowed Chair in Peace Studies and Conflict Resolution. The holder of … Continue reading Mershon Center for International Security at Ohio State University Seeks Candidates for Endowed Chair in Conflict Resolution

Franken Reintroduces Arbitration Fairness Act

Thanks to Professor Rick Bales at Workplace Prof Blog for this tip — Senator Al Franken has, as expected, reintroduced the Arbitration Fairness Act. See Franken re-introduces AFA: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2011/05/afa-re-introduced.html While I am not suprised by the Act’s reintroduction, its broad coverage, eliminating pre-dispute arbitration agreements for consumer, franchise and employment disputes, is not headed for … Continue reading Franken Reintroduces Arbitration Fairness Act

Impact of Concepcion on Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards

One other important note from Concepcion — it would appear more clearly following this decision that a separate standard for manifest disregard of the law as a means for reviewing an arbitration award no longer exists. While the circuits have split on this issue, Concepcion suggests that if it exists at all, it must be … Continue reading Impact of Concepcion on Judicial Review of Arbitration Awards

Continuing the Discussion of the AT&T v. Concepcion Decision: Implications for the future

Well, it would appear that Congress is the only hope for consumers who wish to vindicate their low value claims following the Supreme Court’s decision today in AT&T v. Concepcion. I agree with my fellow blogger Paul Kirgis’s insightful analysis of the case. But, I thought I would add my two cents. The Court was … Continue reading Continuing the Discussion of the AT&T v. Concepcion Decision: Implications for the future