Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Next Generation

Indisputably contributors Andrea Schneider, Sarah Cole, and I are at it again beginning work on Discussions in Dispute Resolution: The Next Generation, the 2nd book in the Discussions in Dispute Resolution series (order the first one here or here).  The book will be a commentary on 16 essential ADR articles for the years 2000-2009, and hopefully it will be available for purchase in late 2025.  For those who are curious, here’s the list of articles to be discussed (in no particular order):

  • Jean R. Sternlight & Jennifer Robbennolt, Good Lawyers Should Be Good Psychologists: Insights for Interviewing and Counseling Clients, 23 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 437 (2008)
  • Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Shattering Negotiation Myths: Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness of Negotiation Style, 7 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 143 (2002)
  • Jonathan R. Cohen, When People are the Means: Negotiating with Respect, 14 Georgetown J. Leg. Ethics 739-802 (2001)
  • Russell Korobkin, Aspirations & Settlement, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1 (2002)
  • Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Apologies and Legal Settlement: An Empirical Examination, 102 Mich. L. Rev.460 (2003)
  • Nancy Welsh, Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got To Do with It, 79 Wash.U.L.Q. 787 (2001)
  • Roselle L. Wissler, Court-Connected Mediation in General Civil Cases: What We Know from Empirical Research, 17 Ohio St. J. Disp. Resol. 641 (2002)
  • Mark Galanter, The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts, 1 J. of Empirical Leg. Studies 459 (2004)
  • James R. Coben & Peter N. Thompson, Disputing Irony: A Systematic Look at Litigation about Mediation, 11 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 43 (2006)
  • Michael Moffitt, Suing Mediators, 83 B.U. L. Rev. 147 (2003)
  • John Lande, Possibilities for Collaborative Law: Ethics and Practice of Lawyer Disqualification and Process Control in a New Model of Lawyering, 64 Ohio St. L. J. 1315 (2003)
  • Christopher R. Drahozal, In Defense of Southland: Reexamining the Legislative History of the Federal Arbitration Act, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 101 (2002)
  • Jean R. Sternlight, As Mandatory Binding Arbitration Meets the Class Action, Will the Class Action Survive?, 42 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1 (2000)
  • Samuel Estreicher, Saturns for Rickshaws: The Stakes in the Debate Over Predispute Employment Arbitration Agreements, 16 Ohio St. J. Disp. Res. 559 (2001)
  • Sarah Cole, Managerial Litigants? The Overlooked Problem of Party Autonomy in Dispute Resolution, 51 Hastings L. J. 1199 (2000)
  • Stephanie Smith & Janet Martinez, An Analytic Framework for Dispute Systems Design, 14 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 123 (2009)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.