Are American Companies Less Innovative in DSD Because Consumer Arbitration is Permissible?

Interesting post by Rick Bales over at Workplace Prof Blog — Rick suggests that European countries may be ahead of the U.S. in development of dispute systems design because the EU countries did not allow the process of consumer arbitration to take hold. American companies, bolstered by Supreme Court rulings, are less innovative in dispute resolution because they have no incentive to develop an alternative to consumer arbitration agreements with their infamous class action waiver provisions.

See what you think: http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/laborprof_blog/2016/02/is-mandatory-arbitration-bad-for-business.html

One thought on “Are American Companies Less Innovative in DSD Because Consumer Arbitration is Permissible?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.