Plea Bargains and Competent Assistance of Counsel

In the upcoming term, the US Supreme Court will hear a pair of appeals from criminal defendants who allege that they did not have competent assistance of counsel during plea bargaining. In one case, Lafler v. Cooper, the defendant states that he rejected a plea offer after his lawyer misunderstood the law and gave him bad advice based on that misunderstanding. The defendant was convicted after a jury trial and got a worse sentence than the plea offer. In the second case, State v. Frye, the defendant’s lawyer failed to tell him about a misdemeanor plea deal and he plead guilty to a felony.

The ABA filed an amicus brief supporting the right to effective assistance of counsel at the plea bargaining stage. The brief is available at: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/amicus/frye_brief.authcheckdam.pdf .

For additional information on SCOTUSblog and amicus briefs see http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/missouri-v-frye/ and http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/lafler-v-cooper/ .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.