NYT weighs in on Concepcion

In an editorial today, the New York Times discussed the recently argued case before the US Supreme Court, AT&T v. Concepcion.  We’ve had lots of commentary on the case on this blog (see Sternlight here Cunningham here, and the Daily Labor Report here), and my prediction is that Concepcion wins because the California law in question treats class actions in the civil litigation realm the same as class actions in the arbitration realm – they’re both unconscionable.  No disfavoring of arbitration here.  The NYT editorial also predicts a win for the respondents.

One thought on “NYT weighs in on Concepcion”

Comments are closed.