Owen Fiss and Sherriff Joe Arpaio – “Against Settlement”

Just before the holidays the US Department of Justice Civil Rights Division concluded a 3 year investigation into America’s Toughest Sheriff, Maricopa County’s (the Phoenix metro) Sheriff Joe Arpaio.  The investigation found discriminatory policing against Latinos, discriminatory jail practices against Latinos, a general culture of bias against Latinos in the Sheriff’s Office, and a practice of retaliatory … Continue reading Owen Fiss and Sherriff Joe Arpaio – “Against Settlement”

Florida Foreclosure Mediation Program Ends with a Yawn

Florida has ended its foreclosure mediation program begun in 2009. The state Supreme Court scuttled the program because it was only settling 4% of the cases. It appears the program had lots of problems, including a failure to contact borrowers and a resistance by lenders to participate actively. What else is new? The legislatures and … Continue reading Florida Foreclosure Mediation Program Ends with a Yawn

Sarah Cole vs. (part of prior versions of) The Arbitration Fairness Act

Sarah Cole recently published On Babies and Bathwater: The Arbitration Fairness Act and the Supreme Court’s Recent Arbitration Jurisprudence, 48 Houston L. Rev. 457 (2011) (available here). She writes, “The AFA misses the mark primarily because it overstates the case against arbitration, rendering the legislation unpalatable to corporate and business interests, as well as many … Continue reading Sarah Cole vs. (part of prior versions of) The Arbitration Fairness Act

In Court, but Out of Sight: Chancery Court Arbitration

In late November, a first-of-its-kind arbitration ended when the mobile phone technology companies Skyworks and AATI settled their dispute over their failed merger. Although there was no award, the arbitration was significant because the arbitrator was a judge on the Delaware Court of Chancery–which just happens to be the court in which the claim was … Continue reading In Court, but Out of Sight: Chancery Court Arbitration

Originalism, Arbitration, and the Civil Jury

In Buckeye Check Cashing v. Cardegna, Justice Scalia authored an opinion for the Supreme Court holding that, where a consumer credit contract contains an arbitration provision, the arbitrator rather than a court decides all questions about the legality of the underlying debt instrument. Buckeye’s holding was controversial, because it effectively pushes a consumer debtor into arbitration … Continue reading Originalism, Arbitration, and the Civil Jury