All posts by mmoffitt@uoregon.edu

Negotiation Over Points … a video not to miss

I don’t really know much about the video appearing here: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-H8xzRNRKKE). One of my research assistants (I would name her, but I forgot to ask if she wanted credit or anonymity) forwarded me the link, along with the explanation that this comes from a show called “Home Movies.”  As she explains, it’s “about kids making … Continue reading Negotiation Over Points … a video not to miss

Defining “Mediation” — Only 5 days left!

I recently received an announcement regarding an effort involving the Department of Labor and the National Association for Community Mediation.  As I understand it, the goal of the effort is to generate some sense of how mediators weigh various definitional aspects or components of mediation. I have separately written a tediously long article entitled “Schmediation … Continue reading Defining “Mediation” — Only 5 days left!

Why This ADR Professor Loves a New Anti-ADR Rule

Hint: The rule isn’t really anti-ADR, even though some ADR practitioners may see it that way. In fact, the rule represents a fantastic step forward for the idea that disputants ought to have considerable control over the process(es) by which their disputes are resolved. In this particular case, the state of Oregon has adopted a … Continue reading Why This ADR Professor Loves a New Anti-ADR Rule

“Did You Hear About The Settlement Where…?”

Professor Ben DePoorter recently published an article, “Law in the Shadow of Bargaining: The Feedback Effect of Civil Settlements”, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 957 (2010), (essay pdf here) exploring the implications of selective disclosure or selective availability of private settlements.  Its abstract: Lawmakers, courts, and legal scholars often express concern that settlement agreements withhold important … Continue reading “Did You Hear About The Settlement Where…?”

“Lawyers Are Overconfident” and other shocking discoveries

Recently posted to SSRN: an article describing a study of lawyers’ prediction about litigation.  It turns out that lawyers are overconfident in their assessments about the likelihood of success.  This result should surprise every person who has never met a lawyer. The study also found that lawyers don’t improve with experience on this measure, and … Continue reading “Lawyers Are Overconfident” and other shocking discoveries

ADR Works In Progress: Oregon, October 15-16, 2010

The Fourth Annual ADR Works-in-progress conference will take place at the University of Oregon October 15-16, 2010.  The conference website (http://www.adr.uoregon.edu/2010WIPconference/) provides great information, and there’s an online registration form available on that site.  I hope we see lots of you there! Professor Jen Reynolds will be taking the lead on the conference organization, and … Continue reading ADR Works In Progress: Oregon, October 15-16, 2010