Indisputably

Indisputably

Linking Dispute Resolution Scholarship, Education, and Practice

Search
Skip to content
  • About Us
  • Contributors
  • Links
  • Tags
  • Subscribe

Deadline Extended for Law & Society

December 4, 2012 Cynthia Alkon

The Law and Society Association has extended the deadline for proposals for the next meeting.  The new deadline is December 11, 2012.  The meeting is May 30, 2013-June 2, 2013, in Boston, MA.

For more information and the the link to submit proposals see:  http://www.lawandsociety.org/boston2013/proposals.html

Post navigation

Previous PostSupreme Court Decides Yet Another Arbitration CaseNext PostNitro-Lift Technologies v. Howard: The Arbitration Locomotive Rolls On

Recent Comments

  • Alvin Goldman on Crowdsourced ODR: “I would add one more problem with a crowdsource approach–diligence. Participant votes are equally weighted even though some participants may…”
  • Rick Bales on Tech-Trust Nexus: A White Paper on the Future of Online Dispute Resolution: “This is terrific, and thank you for sharing. Moreover, the timing of the post is impeccable — the next post…”
  • Kathleen Bird on Getting Beyond Simple Stories About AI: “Very thoughtful and informative article John.”
  • Brian on Can the Arbitrator Also Mediate?: “Thanks for sharing! Two of the three models work and I enjoyed learning about the procedural safeguards. My article on…”
  • Jill Gross on Help Wanted: ADR Law Prof Hiring: “Despite initial indications, it appears the NextGen bar will not be testing beyond the very basics of ADR. From what…”
  • John Lande on Could AI Hallucinations Improve Professional Thinking?: “Thanks, as always, for your kind words, Rosa. Hallucinations do create risks, but avoiding AI entirely may sacrifice substantial benefits.…”
  • Rosa Abdelnour on Could AI Hallucinations Improve Professional Thinking?: “John. You always surprising me with deep and great articles. Very interesting how hallucinations can improve critical thinking, like a…”
  • Jennifer Brown on California’s Proposed Ethics Rules Emphasize Duty to Avoid AI Hallucinations: “This is a helpful post, John. Thanks for the update and insightful commentary.”
  • John Lande on Bummed About AI?  So Am I.  Now What?: “Thanks very much for your comment, Greg. I appreciate your thoughtful perspective. I think that it is wise to be…”
  • Gregory Burge on Bummed About AI?  So Am I.  Now What?: “Thank you for the headline, because who hasn’t been dismayed with AI occasionally? You said it best, “The important thing…”

Archives

Subscribe

Enter your Email


Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz

Editorial Board

Andrea Schneider, Chair
Posts | Profile | SSRN

John Lande
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Colin Rule
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Contributors

Michael Moffitt
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Sarah Cole
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Art Hinshaw
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Jill Gross
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Cynthia Alkon
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Kelly Browe Olsen
Posts | Profile | Hein

Jennifer Reynolds
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Hiro Aragaki
Posts | Profile | SSRN

Contributor Login
Cardozo Law School

Generously supported by Cardozo Law School and the Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution.
Proudly powered by WordPress
Secret Link