Call for Applications – Vis Pre-Moot

Are you competing at the Annual Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot and do you want to take part in an ICC Vis Pre-Moot? The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) organizes annual Pre-Moots in both Paris and in New York.

Why participate in the ICC Vis Pre-Moot?
• To prepare for the Annual Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot
• To measure up against and interact with other students from a wide range of different jurisdictions and legal systems
• To receive comments from and interact with arbitrators from different professional, cultural and legal backgrounds
• To practice and improve your advocacy skills
• To refine and adjust your oral arguments just before participating in the Vis Moot in Vienna
• To take this unique opportunity to visit the ICC Headquarters in Paris, and interact with members of the Secretariat of the ICC International Court of Arbitration.
• Participate in Paris in a roundtable of prominent practitioners on an arbitration topic

How to apply?

1. Applications are open via the event pages below
• Only one team per university is eligible to apply
• Teams must include a minimum of 2 students
2. You will receive an automatic reply to confirm receipt of your application
3. The selection process will start after the application deadline

Please note that online participation is excluded!

ICC Vis Pre-Moot in New-York
New York, USA | 12 February 2027
• Applications are open until
19 November 2026
• Teams will be notified by
1 December 2026

ICC Vis Pre-Moot | Events2Go
Paris, France | 08-10 March 2027
• Applications are open until
04 December 2026
• Teams will be notified by
14 December 2026

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alvin Goldman on Crowdsourced ODR: “I would add one more problem with a crowdsource approach–diligence. Participant votes are equally weighted even though some participants may…”

Rick Bales on Tech-Trust Nexus: A White Paper on the Future of Online Dispute Resolution: “This is terrific, and thank you for sharing. Moreover, the timing of the post is impeccable — the next post…”

Kathleen Bird on Getting Beyond Simple Stories About AI: “Very thoughtful and informative article John.”

Brian on Can the Arbitrator Also Mediate?: “Thanks for sharing! Two of the three models work and I enjoyed learning about the procedural safeguards. My article on…”

Jill Gross on Help Wanted: ADR Law Prof Hiring: “Despite initial indications, it appears the NextGen bar will not be testing beyond the very basics of ADR. From what…”

John Lande on Could AI Hallucinations Improve Professional Thinking?: “Thanks, as always, for your kind words, Rosa. Hallucinations do create risks, but avoiding AI entirely may sacrifice substantial benefits.…”

Rosa Abdelnour on Could AI Hallucinations Improve Professional Thinking?: “John. You always surprising me with deep and great articles. Very interesting how hallucinations can improve critical thinking, like a…”

Jennifer Brown on California’s Proposed Ethics Rules Emphasize Duty to Avoid AI Hallucinations: “This is a helpful post, John. Thanks for the update and insightful commentary.”

John Lande on Bummed About AI? So Am I. Now What?: “Thanks very much for your comment, Greg. I appreciate your thoughtful perspective. I think that it is wise to be…”

Gregory Burge on Bummed About AI? So Am I. Now What?: “Thank you for the headline, because who hasn’t been dismayed with AI occasionally? You said it best, “The important thing…”