The “Mediator March” and Ms. Manners

On the lighter side, today, one of my colleagues, Larry Garvin, sent me a link to the “Mediator March”, composed in 1915 by James M. Fulton (1873-1940). As Larry notes, it is odd to think of a march as representative of ADR, but, who knows? Here is a link: http://www.forgottenamericanmusic.com/recordings/The_Mediator_March.mp3 This weekend, Ms. Manners’ column … Continue reading The “Mediator March” and Ms. Manners

Second Circuit Rules that Manifest Disregard Exists After Hall Street

The Second Circuit in Stolt-Nielsen SA v. Animalfeeds Int’l Corp., No. 06-3473 (2nd Cir. 2008), www.reinsurancefocus.com/uploads/Stolt.pdf, held that courts may continue to review arbitration awards to determine whether the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law when he or she rules on a case. Acknowledging that some courts have held that manifest disregard did not survive the … Continue reading Second Circuit Rules that Manifest Disregard Exists After Hall Street

Against Integrative Bargaining

Professor Russell Korobkin from UCLA gave an interesting talk at the AALS DR Section Works-in-Progress Conference a couple of weeks ago.  His talk, Against Integrative Bargaining, was interesting and certainly caught the attention of everyone at the conference.  His basic thesis was simple: Integrative Bargaining (or problem-solving negotiation or interest based negotiation) is oversold.  Looking … Continue reading Against Integrative Bargaining

Dispute Resolution and the Normalization of International Adjudication

I attended a conference at NYU two weeks ago as part of NYU’s Journal of International Law & Politics symposium on the “Normalization of Adjudication in Complex International Governance Regimes.”  Invited to bring a little dispute resolution to this otherwise complete adjudicatory focus, it was very interesting to think about what the “normalization” of international courts and … Continue reading Dispute Resolution and the Normalization of International Adjudication

Certiorari Grant in Third Arbitration Case for 2008-09 Term

I was just informed that certiorari was granted in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al., v. Carlisle, et al. (08-146), on Friday. The question at issue is whether, under the Federal Arbitration Act, federal circuits courts have jurisdiction to hear appeals of denials of motions to compel arbitration raised by parties that did not sign the … Continue reading Certiorari Grant in Third Arbitration Case for 2008-09 Term